Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Delphin INKS 6000X

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
58.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490
Conclusion
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Delphin INKS?
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX
