Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
58.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Both Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX and Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX stands out for a ball bearings of 7. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
