Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
58.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX and Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX stands out for a ball bearings of 7. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
