Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
58.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX and Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX stands out for a ball bearings of 7. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX
