Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
58.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200

Shimano Ocea Jigger
Multireels
90.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight791g / 27.9oz
Line retireve per crank117 centimeter / 46.06 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €509.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.8/494
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and ball bearings (7). While Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Shimano Ocea Jigger?
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX
