Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
58.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200

Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
Spinning
32.80 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.04lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank83cm / 32.68inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.33/240. 0.37/190, 0.405/160 lb/yds: 12/265, 16/170, 20/120
Conclusion
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 6000 FI, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.3:1) and weight (275g / 9,7oz). While Shimano Sedona 6000 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Shimano Sedona 6000 FI?
Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Solid value at €32.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R
