Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Regal LT
Spinning
46.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €51.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX and Shimano Cardiff 301A score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score, and line retrieve per crankdurability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Cardiff 301A may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Regal LT and Shimano Cardiff 301A?
Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Shimano Cardiff 301A
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX
