Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Regal LT
Spinning
46.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch). While Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Regal LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
