Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Regal LT
Spinning
46.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X clearly outshines Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch). While Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Regal LT and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG?
Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Similar comparisons

Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX vs Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF


Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF vs Shimano TLD 25X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX vs Shimano TLD 20X


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Shimano TLD 25X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 25000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano TLD 25X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X
