Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Regal LT
Spinning
46.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX and Shimano Cardiff 201A score below average overall, indicating some compromises in line retrieve per crank, total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX offers a slight edge in gear ratio, while Shimano Cardiff 201A may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Regal LT and Shimano Cardiff 201A?
Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Shimano Cardiff 201A
- A 7 out of 10 (4 A-RB + 1 RB) ball bearing gives a smooth performance across most typical fishing situations
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX
