Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI

Daiwa Regal LT
Spinning
46.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
Spinning
32.80 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.04lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank83cm / 32.68inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.33/240. 0.37/190, 0.405/160 lb/yds: 12/265, 16/170, 20/120
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX and Shimano Sedona 6000 FI score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX offers a slight edge in weight, while Shimano Sedona 6000 FI may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Regal LT and Shimano Sedona 6000 FI?
Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.73 out of 10 (190g / 6,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Decent value at €52.00, it covers the basics, making it a great option for beginners or casual spinning setups
Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
- 6.86 out of 10 (83cm / 32.68inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X
