Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Regal LT
Spinning
54.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX and Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX stands out for a ball bearings of 7. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Regal LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX
