Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Regal LT
Spinning
54.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX and Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX stands out for a ball bearings of 7. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Regal LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Delphin FRIZ


Delphin FRIZ vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X
