Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000

Abu GARCIA Revo MGX
Spinning
20 Sp/lx
63.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight170g / 6.38oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €255.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 SP/L
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220
Conclusion
Both Daiwa TANACOM 1200X and Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa TANACOM 1200X offers a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, while Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX stands out for a weight of 170g / 6,38oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Abu GARCIA Revo MGX?
Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6,38oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX
