Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
64.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €72.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa TANACOM 1200X and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa TANACOM 1200X offers a durability of 5.72 out of 10, while Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX stands out for a weight of 290g / 10,23oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT?
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.34 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
