Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank85 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX clearly outshines Daiwa TANACOM 1200X, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.7:1) and weight (175g / 6,17oz). While Daiwa TANACOM 1200X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8 out of 10 (85 centimeter) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX
