Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Daiwa TANACOM 1200X, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and weight (200g / 7,05oz). While Daiwa TANACOM 1200X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
