Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000

Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN
Spinning
53.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa TANACOM 1200X edges out Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and the durability (5.72 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.3:1 and a weight of 300g / 10,58oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN?
Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX
