Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Penn Battle III 6000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000

Penn Battle III
Spinning
67.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.81 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight590g / 20.81oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €113.30
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/310
Conclusion
Both Daiwa TANACOM 1200X and Penn Battle III 6000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa TANACOM 1200X offers a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, while Penn Battle III 6000X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 104 centimeter / 40.94 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Penn Battle III?
Penn Battle III 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A high retrieve rate of 9.9 out of 10 (104 centimeter / 40.94 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX
