Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.5kg / 12,13lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €65.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Conclusion
Both Daiwa TANACOM 1200X and Penn FIERCE IV 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa TANACOM 1200X offers a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, while Penn FIERCE IV 2500X stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX
