Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa TANACOM 1200X edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and the total score (7.24 out of 10). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a weight of 545g / 19,22oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
