Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Daiwa TANACOM 1200X and Shimano AERO XR C3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa TANACOM 1200X offers a durability of 5.72 out of 10, while Shimano AERO XR C3000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- Rated 8.8 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a line retrieve of 73 centimeter / 28.74 inch (5.43 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
