Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000

Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €416.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 MHGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/125
Conclusion
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX clearly outshines Daiwa TANACOM 1200X, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.0:1) and weight (180g / 6,35oz). While Daiwa TANACOM 1200X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Shimano Exsence?
Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.3 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
