Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
70.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.34 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 5000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/175
Conclusion
Both Daiwa TANACOM 1200X and Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa TANACOM 1200X offers a total score of 7.24 out of 10, while Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A high retrieve rate of 10 out of 10 (105 centimeter / 41.34 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
