Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Daiwa TANACOM 1200X and Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa TANACOM 1200X offers a total score of 7.24 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX stands out for a weight of 245g / 8,64oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX
