Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT
Spinning
4000 D-cx
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €176.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX edges out Daiwa TANACOM 800X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.2:1) and the weight (210g / 7,41oz). Still, Daiwa TANACOM 800X holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.71 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Daiwa 17 Prorex LT?
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX
