Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD edges out Daiwa TANACOM 800X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) and the gear ratio (4.7:1). Still, Daiwa TANACOM 800X holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.71 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With 9.1 out of 10 score (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) (line retrieve), this reel excels in speed which makes it perfect for rapid match fishing where every second counts
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A
