Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €72.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa TANACOM 800X and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa TANACOM 800X offers a durability of 5.71 out of 10, while Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.3:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Delphin HORNET 40X
