Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
66.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa TANACOM 800X and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa TANACOM 800X offers a durability of 5.71 out of 10, while Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX
