Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800

Daiwa 20 Laguna LT
Spinning
60.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200
Conclusion
Daiwa TANACOM 800X edges out Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.71 out of 10) and the total score (7.24 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.3:1 and a weight of 260g / 9,17oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Daiwa 20 Laguna LT?
Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX
