Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa TANACOM 800X, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and ball bearings (8). While Daiwa TANACOM 800X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
