Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX edges out Daiwa TANACOM 800X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.2:1) and the weight (205g / 7,23oz). Still, Daiwa TANACOM 800X holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.71 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
