Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX clearly outshines Daiwa TANACOM 800X, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and weight (175g / 6,17oz). While Daiwa TANACOM 800X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa TANACOM 800X
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX
