Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa TANACOM 800X and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa TANACOM 800X offers a durability of 5.71 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X
