Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800

Daiwa Fuego LT
Spinning
3000d-cx
66.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €77.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa TANACOM 800X and Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa TANACOM 800X offers a durability of 5.71 out of 10, while Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.3:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Daiwa Fuego LT?
Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
