Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.5kg / 12,13lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €65.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Conclusion
Both Daiwa TANACOM 800X and Penn FIERCE IV 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa TANACOM 800X offers a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, while Penn FIERCE IV 2500X stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
