Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Daiwa TANACOM 800X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.24 out of 10) and maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs). While Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa TANACOM 800X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Daiwa TANACOM 800X
- Solid value at €595.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of multireels fishing needs
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin HORNET 40X
