Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800

Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
Spinning
29.20 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight375g / 13.23oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €53.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130
Conclusion
Daiwa TANACOM 800X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and total score (7.24 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa TANACOM 800X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R?
Daiwa TANACOM 800X
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- Solid value at €595.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of multireels fishing needs
Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX
