Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANASENSOR
Multireels
69.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/380

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX edges out Daiwa TANASENSOR with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.8:1). Still, Daiwa TANASENSOR holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.63 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 74 centimeter / 29.13 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANASENSOR and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa TANASENSOR
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX
