Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANASENSOR
Multireels
69.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/380

Delphin MonoDRAG
Spinning
58.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/210
Conclusion
Daiwa TANASENSOR edges out Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) and the durability (8.63 out of 10). Still, Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 5+1 and a ergonomics of 6.18 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANASENSOR and Delphin MonoDRAG?
Daiwa TANASENSOR
- At a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs (scoring 5.51 out of 10), the reel has a modest drag setup which is enough for smaller fish or relaxed situations where finesse matters more
- A score of 6.29 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) gives a decent speed but doess not rush a lot
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X
