Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANASENSOR
Multireels
69.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/380

Shimano Aero BB
Spinning
39.80 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €61.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Daiwa TANASENSOR clearly outshines Shimano Aero BB 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.63 out of 10) and total score (6.97 out of 10). While Shimano Aero BB 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa TANASENSOR is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANASENSOR and Shimano Aero BB?
Daiwa TANASENSOR
- A gear ratio of 4.3:1 (scoring 6.78 out of 10) gives you a nice middle ground, just enough torque to handle pressure, but still quick enough for general use
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
- Solid value at €189.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of multireels fishing needs
Shimano Aero BB 4000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
