Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANASENSOR

Multireels

69.70 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.63 out of 10

Ergonomics5.93 out of 10

Gear ratio4.3:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight520g / 18.34oz

Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch

Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €189.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeStar drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/380

Shimano Sahara FJ

Spinning

78.00 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.07 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs

Weight280g / 9.88oz

Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €71.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000 XG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Conclusion

Both Daiwa TANASENSOR and Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa TANASENSOR offers a durability of 8.63 out of 10, while Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX stands out for a ball bearings of 4+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.