Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANASENSOR
Multireels
69.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/380

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Daiwa TANASENSOR clearly outshines Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (4.3:1) and total score (6.97 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa TANASENSOR is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANASENSOR and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Daiwa TANASENSOR
- A gear ratio of 4.3:1 (scoring 6.78 out of 10) gives you a nice middle ground, just enough torque to handle pressure, but still quick enough for general use
- Solid value at €189.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of multireels fishing needs
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
