Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANASENSOR
Multireels
69.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/380

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Daiwa TANASENSOR clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.63 out of 10) and weight (520g / 18,34oz). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa TANASENSOR is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANASENSOR and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Daiwa TANASENSOR
- At a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs (scoring 5.51 out of 10), the reel has a modest drag setup which is enough for smaller fish or relaxed situations where finesse matters more
- Scoring 8.27 out of 10 (520g / 18,34oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX
