Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANASENSOR
Multireels
69.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/380

Shimano Sahara 3000S R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics4.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight280g / 9.87oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Daiwa TANASENSOR clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 3000S R, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.63 out of 10) and total score (6.97 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 3000S R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa TANASENSOR is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANASENSOR and Shimano Sahara 3000S R?
Daiwa TANASENSOR
- At a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs (scoring 5.51 out of 10), the reel has a modest drag setup which is enough for smaller fish or relaxed situations where finesse matters more
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano Sahara 3000S R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX
