Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANASENSOR

Multireels

69.70 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.63 out of 10

Ergonomics5.93 out of 10

Gear ratio4.3:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight520g / 18.34oz

Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch

Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €189.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeStar drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/380

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI

Spinning

63.40 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.18 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs

Weight245g / 8.64oz

Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €52.80
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500 HG FI
Handle typeHandle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160 lb/yds: 6/200, 8/140, 10/120

Conclusion

Both Daiwa TANASENSOR and Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa TANASENSOR offers a durability of 8.63 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI stands out for a ball bearings of 3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.