Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €95.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX clearly outshines Daiwa TD FEEDER QD, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (160g / 5,64oz). While Daiwa TD FEEDER QD may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TD FEEDER QD and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
- With a maximum drag of 9.6 out of 10 (8kg), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (6) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X
