Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €95.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €181.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX edges out Daiwa TD FEEDER QD with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (165g / 5,82oz) and the durability (8.6 out of 10). Still, Daiwa TD FEEDER QD holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 87 centimeter and a maximum drag of 8kg, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa TD FEEDER QD and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
- A line retrieve score of 8.2 out of 10 87 centimeter), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
- With a score like 8.9 out of 10 (165g / 5,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX
