Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €95.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150

Daiwa 20 Luvias LT
Spinning
3000d-cx
94.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €379.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa TD FEEDER QD, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (180g / 6,35oz). While Daiwa TD FEEDER QD may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TD FEEDER QD and Daiwa 20 Luvias LT?
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (6) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
