Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €95.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX edges out Daiwa TD FEEDER QD with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (170g / 6oz) and the durability (8.5 out of 10). Still, Daiwa TD FEEDER QD holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 87 centimeter and a maximum drag of 8kg, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa TD FEEDER QD and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
- A line retrieve score of 8.2 out of 10 87 centimeter), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa BG 3500X
